a 英文版在此添加了如下内容：

Finally,. it. is. paramount. that. we. maintain. the. distinction. between. global dialogism. and. the.‘dialogism’. of. Mikhail. Bakhtin.. For. Bakhtin,.‘dialogism’. is. essentially. an. outgrowth.of.poetic.or.literary.theory,.one.that.concerns.the.relation.between.double. or. multiple. voices,. and. texts.. If. you. wish,. it. may. be. regarded. as.‘a. philosophy. of. language’.‘relationships.（Clark.and.Holquist,.1984:.212..My.emphasis）,.or,.applied.to.between. distinct. cultural. and. ideological. units’,. and.‘conflicts. between. nations. or. religions’.（de.Man,.1989:.109）-.in.this.regard,.it.is.a.toolbox.for.cultural.analysis,. functioning.much.like.global dialogism,.as.demonstrated.above..However,.according.to. Bakhtin’s. dialogism,. it. is. only. at. the. discursive. level. that. dialogue. can. be. achieved.. It. is. then. reasonable. for. Julia. Kristeva. and. Tzvetan. Todorov. to. develop. Bakhtin’s. dialogism. into. their. term.‘intertextuality’. which.‘belongs. to. discourse’.（Todorov,.1984:.61）.. As. Todorov. quoted. from. Bakhtin,.‘Dialogical. relations. are.（semantic） relations.between.all.the.utterances.within.verbal.communication’.（Quoted.in.Todorov,.1984:.61..My.emphasis）..Although.Bakhtin.does.not.overlook.the.author.or.creator. of. the. utterance,. and. therefore.‘the. dialogical. reaction. endows. with. personhood. the. utterance.to.which.it.reacts’.（Quoted.in.Todorov,.1984:.61）,.Todorov.insists,.‘this. does. not. mean,. [...].that. the.utterance.gives.expression. to. the.inimitable.individuality. of. its. author.. The. utterance. at. hand. is. perceived. rather. as. the. manifestation. of. a. conception. of. the. world,. while. the. absent. one. as. that. of. another. conception;. the. dialogue. takes. place. between. the. two.’.（Todorov,. 1984:.61）Bakhtin’s. concept. of. ‘Exotropy’,.or,.‘outsideness’（Morson.and.Emerson,.1989:.52）,.radical.as.it.may.be,..and.as.much.as.it.may.lead.us.‘from.the.intralinguistic.to.intracultural.relationships’（de..Man,.1989:.109）,.remains.dialogical.and.therefore.discursive..In.sum,.the.dialogue,. in.terms.of.Bakhtin’s.dialogism,.is.discursive,.which.appears.only.between.discourses,. conceptions,. or. in. Sausure’s. terminology,. signifiers.. While. Bakhtin’s. dialogism. is. basically. linguistic. and. epistemological,. global dialogism. goes. beyond. perception,. signification,. interpretation,. and. is. based. upon. a. life-ontology.. It. is. a. philosophical. approach. in. which. voices. or. texts. involved. in. dialogue.are.understood.as.individual.subjects.that.are.constituted.not.only.by.discourses,.and.ideology,.as.Althusser.would.have.it,.but.also.by.their.material.existence,.and.their.réel.as.Lacan.would.remind.us,.and.which.can.never.be.fully.penetrated.by.discourses..To.repeat,.the.global dialogism.is.based.on.both.modernity.and.postmodernity,.both.subjectivity.and.intersubjectivity,.on.their.dynamic.relations,.and.ultimately,.their.dialectical.synthesis.

本段参考文献如下：

1.Clark,. Katerina. and. Michael. Holquist.（1984）Mikhail Bakhtin.. Cambridge,. MA:. The.Belknap.Press.

2.de.Man,.Paul.（1989）‘Dialogue.and.Dialogism’,.in.Gary.Saul.Morson.and.Caryl. Emerson.（eds）..Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Challenges,.pp..105-114..Evanston,. Illinois:.Northwestern.University.Press..

3.Morson,. Gary. Saul,. and. Caryl. Emerson.（1989）‘Introduction:. Rethinking. Bakhtin’,. in.Gary.Saul.Morson.and.Caryl.Emerson.（eds）.Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Challenges,. pp..1-60..Evanston,.Illinois:.Northwestern.University.Press..